The RPCS3 team, behind one of the most advanced open-source PS3 emulators, has updated its contribution guidelines to push back against the influx of low-quality, AI-generated code submissions. Citing a rise in untested 'AI slop' and 'vibe coded' pull requests, the team now requires full human ownership and understanding of all submitted code. While AI tools are permitted for research and reverse engineering, autonomous AI agents or unreviewed generated code will not be accepted without clear disclosure.

The updated policy mandates that contributors disclose the extent of AI involvement in any pull request, including which parts were AI-generated and what human testing occurred. Submissions lacking this transparency may be closed without review. The team emphasized that their goal is to protect the project’s stability and respect the time of maintainers, warning that repeated violations will lead to repository bans.

This move reflects a broader debate in the software development community about the role of generative AI. As large language models become more capable, projects like RPCS3 are setting boundaries to ensure code quality and accountability. The team’s blunt message—'Learn how to debug, code, and leave behind something useful'—resonates with veteran developers concerned about the erosion of foundational skills.